4.5 Article

Packaging of Microfluidic Devices for Fluid Interconnection Using Thermoplastics

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 354-362

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2009.2013404

关键词

Bonding; fluidics; interconnections; packaging

资金

  1. Innovative Manufacturing and Construction Research Centre (IMCRC) at Loughborough University
  2. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C534212/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new packaging method for microfluidic devices is proposed of polymer overmolding to form a fluidic manifold integrated with the device in a single step. The anticipated advantages of the proposed method of packaging are ease of assembly and low part count, making it suitable for low cost and high volume manufacturing. This paper reports the results of a preliminary investigation into this concept. Glass and silicon inserts of 25 x 20 min in size, used to represent microfluidic devices, were overmolded in an injection molding process with a range of polymers. The inserts were found to survive the molding process intact. The adhesion between overmold and insert was investigated by subjecting the interface between the overmold and insert surface to a hydrostatic pressure of up to 100 lbf/in(2) (6.9 bar). The durability of the interfacial adhesion to hydrolysis was investigated by immersion in water at 50 degrees C for 24 h before testing. Direct measurements of adhesion strength between polymer and glass were also attempted by tensile tests on lap-jointed samples. The best and most durable adhesion for glass and silicon inserts was found for polyamide (PA) 12, which is a low hygroscopicity PA. The ranking of polymers by their performances in the pressurization tests was consistent with the ranking by the calculated work-of-adhesion values for polymer/glass and polymer/silicon joints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据