4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Microfluidic systems integrated with a sample pretreatment device for fast nucleic-acid amplification

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 288-301

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2008.916295

关键词

enrichment; magnetic bead; microelectromechanical systems (MEMS); microfluidics; pretreatment; reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a new miniature reverse-tanscription polymerase chain-reaction (RT-PCR) system integrating a sample pretreatment device for fast nucleic-acid amplification and diagnosis of viruses and bacteria. In the system, a two-way serpentine-shape (s-shape) pneumatic micropump and a magnetic bioseparator were developed for separation and enrichment of viruses and bacteria. This new bioseparator can also be used as microheating chambers to perform RT-PCR. Taking advantage of the specific interaction between the antibodies on the surface of magnetic beads and the surface antigens on viruses or bacteria, the target virus and bacteria were recognized and further separated and purified from the biosamples by a magnetic field generated by the bioseparator. The target purified virus/bacteria was then lysed to release ribonucleic acid (RNA) or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) for the subsequent RT-PCR processes. Experimental results showed that the target virus[bacteria was successfully separated and enriched by the high specificity and selectivity of anti body-conjugated magnetic beads, and the subsequent amplification of RNA/DNA was automatically completed by utilizing the on-chip microheaters and the micro temperature sensor. The high mixing efficiency of the two-way s-shape pump and the rapid heating/cooling rate of the microheating chambers can significantly shorten the pretreatment and diagnosis processes. As a whole, the developed system may provide a powerful platform for sample pretreatment and fast disease diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据