4.4 Article

Cotesia plutellae Bracovirus Suppresses Expression of an Antimicrobial Peptide, Cecropin, in the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella, Challenged by Bacteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 117-123

出版社

MICROBIOLOGICAL SOCIETY KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12275-009-9261-3

关键词

polydnavirus; cecropin; P. xylostella; C. plutellae; expression; immunosuppression

资金

  1. Korean Government (MOEHRD) [KRF-2008-313-F00009]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An endoparasitoid wasp, Cotesia plutellae, induces significant immunosuppression of host insect, Plutella xylostella. This study was focused on suppression in humoral immune response of P. xylostella parasitized by C. plutellae. An EST database of P xylostella provided a putative cecropin gene (PxCec) which is 627 bp long and encodes 66 amino acids. A signal peptide (22 amino acids) is predicted and two putative O-glycosylation sites in threonine are located at positions 58 and 64. Without bacterial infection, PxCec was expressed in pupa and adult stages but not in the egg and larval stages. Upon bacterial challenge, however, the larvae expressed PxCec as early as 3 h post infection (PI) and maintained high expression levels at 12-24 h PI. By 48 h PI, its expression noticeably diminished. All tested tissues of bacteria-infected P. xylostella showed PxCec expression. However, other microbes, such as virus and fungus, did not induce the PxCec expression. Parasitization by C. plutellae suppressed the expression of PxCec in response to bacterial challenge. Among the parasitic factors of C. plutellae, its symbiotic virus (C. plutellae bracovirus: CpBV) alone was able to inhibit the expression of PxCec of P xylostella challenged by bacteria. These results indicate that PxCec expression is regulated by both immune and developmental processes in P xylostella. The parasitization by C. plutellae inhibited the expression of PxCec by the wasp's symbiotic virus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据