4.3 Article

Typing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from live broilers and retail broiler meat by flaA-RFLP, MLST, PFGE and REP-PCR

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 84, 期 2, 页码 194-201

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.11.016

关键词

flaA-RFLP; PFGE; MLST; REP-PCR; Campylobacter jejuni; Campylobacter coli

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyzed 100 Campylobacter spp. isolates (C. jejuni and C coli) from Grenada, Puerto Rico and Alabama, which were collected from live broilers or retail broiler meat. We analyzed these isolates with four molecular typing methods: restriction fragment length polymorphism of the flaA gene (flaA-RFLP), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and automated repetitive extragenic palindromic polymerase chain reaction (REP-PCR) using the DiversiLab system. All methods performed similarly for the typing of C jejuni and C coli. The DNA extraction method appears to influence the results obtained with REP-PCR. This method was better for the typing of C jejuni than C coil, however both REP-PCR and flaA-RFLP generated types that were indistinguishable between C jejuni and C. coli and appeared to be random, without any relationship to species, location, or source of isolates. PFGE and MIST generated typing results that had a better correlation with the geographic location of the isolates and showed higher concordance with the Wallace coefficient. The adjusted Rand coefficient did not show higher concordance among the methods, although the PFGE/MLST combination exhibited the highest concordance. PFGE and MLST revealed a better discriminatory power for C coli isolates than REP-PCR or flaA-RFLP. The use of readily available online tools to calculate the confidence interval of the Simpson's index of diversity and the adjusted Rand and Wallace coefficients helped estimate the discriminatory power of typing methods. Further studies using different C jejuni and C. coli strains may expand our understanding of the benefits and limitations of each of these typing methods for epidemiological studies of Campylobacter spp. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据