4.3 Article

Effect of PCR amplicon length on suppressing signals from membrane-compromised cells by propidium monoazide treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 87, 期 1, 页码 89-95

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.07.016

关键词

Microbial viability; Propidium monoazide; Live-dead discrimination; Amplicon length; Viability PCR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment of microbiological samples with viability dyes prior to extraction of DNA and PCR amplification for downstream analysis has evolved into a commonly applied method. The addition of this easy-to-perform step to the sample analysis procedure inhibits the amplification of DNA from dead cells with compromised cell membranes. The method is currently used both in combination with quantitative PCR (qPCR), end-point PCR, and isothermal amplification. We present here a detailed study of the effect of amplicon size on amplification signals from unstressed and heat-exposed cells after treatment with propidium monoazide (PMA). PMA treatment was shown to be more efficient in excluding dead cells from the analysis both in combination with qPCR (PMA-qPCR) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PMA-DGGE), when longer amplicons were used. When applied to pure cultures of the fish pathogens Vibrio anguillarum and Flavobacterium psychrophilum exposed to a heat gradient ranging from mild to lethal, qPCR product lengths did not influence PMA-qPCR results at low temperatures, whereas an increasingly strong impact was seen at higher temperatures. Membrane permeability as a result of heat exposure might however have to be considered a conservative parameter for cell death for these pathogens as culturability and redox activity were lost at lower stress intensities than membrane integrity. When applying PMA-DGGE to an environmental water sample which was either left untreated or was exposed to heat, differences to non-PMA treated samples tended to slightly increase when amplified fragments in the first round of the nested PCR were longer, whereas the impact of 1st-round cycle numbers remains unclear. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据