4.3 Article

Construction and evaluation of pMycoFos, a fosmid shuttle vector for Mycobacterium spp. with inducible gene expression and copy number control

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 86, 期 3, 页码 320-326

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.06.005

关键词

Mycobacterium; Fosmid; Cloning vector; Gene expression

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0877315]
  2. Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship
  3. Australian Research Council [DP0877315] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular tools for Gram-positive bacteria such as Mycobacterium are less well-developed than those for Gram-negatives such as Escherichiacoli. This has slowed the molecular-genetic characterisation of Mycobacterium spp, which is unfortunate, since this genus has high medical, environmental and industrial significance. Here, we developed a new Mycobacterium shuttle vector (pMycoFos, 12.5 kb, Km(R)) which combines desirable features of several previous vectors (controllable copy number in E. coli, inducible gene expression in Mycobacterium) and provides a new multiple cloning site compatible with large inserts of high-GC content DNA. Copy number control in E. coli was confirmed by the increased KmR of cultures after arabinose induction and the greater DNA yield of vector from arabinose-induced cultures. Measurement of beta-galactosidase activity in pMycoFos clones carrying the lacZ gene showed that in Mycobacterium smegmatis mc(2)-155, expression was inducible by acetamide, but in E. coli EPI300, the expression level was primarily determined by the vector copy number. Examination of protein profiles on SDS-PAGE gels confirmed the beta-galactosidase assay results. Construction of a fosmid library with the new vector confirmed that it could carry large DNA inserts. The new vector enabled the stable cloning and expression of an ethene monooxygenase gene cluster, which had eluded previous attempts at heterologous expression. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据