4.3 Article

Differentiation among the Vibrio cholerae serotypes O1, O139, O141 and non-O1, non-O139, non-O141 using specific monoclonal antibodies with dot blotting

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 224-233

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.07.022

关键词

Dot blotting; Monoclonal antibody; Vibrio cholerae; Western blotting

资金

  1. Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seven different monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific to only Vibrio cholerae were produced using a combination of five representative serotypes of V. cholerae for immunization. The first three MAbs (VC-93, VC-82 and VC-223) were specific to the V. cholerae serogroup 01 with different avidity for the serotypes 01 Inaba and 01 Ogawa. The fourth and the fifth MAbs were specific to V. cholerae 0139 (VC-812) or 0141 (VC-191) serogroups, respectively. The sixth MAb (VC-26) bound to all three serogroups of V. cholerae. The seventh MAb (VC-63) bound to all twenty five isolates of V. cholerae used in this study. None of the seven MAbs showed cross-reactivity with other Vibrio spp. or closely-related V. cholerae species, V. mimicus or other gram-negative bacteria. The eighth MAbs (VC-201) specific to almost all Vibrio spp. was also obtained. In dot blotting, these MAbs can be used to detect a diluted pure culture of V. cholerae in solution with a sensitivity range of from 10(5) to 10(7) CFU ml(-1). However, the detection capability could be improved equivalent to that of PCR technique after preincubation of samples in alkaline peptone water (APW). Thus, these MAbs constitute convenient immunological tools that can be used for simple, rapid and simultaneous direct detection and differentiation of the individual serotypes of V. cholerae in complex samples, such as food and infected animals, without the requirement for bacterial isolation or biochemical characterization. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据