4.3 Article

Novel plasmid-based genetic tools for the study of promoters and terminators in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Enterococcus faecalis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 156-163

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.08.004

关键词

Gram-positive bacteria; Plasmids; pMV158; Promoters; Terminators

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CSD2008-00013-INTERMODS, BFU2009-11868, BES-2007-17086]
  2. Community of Madrid and the Spanish National Research Council [CCG08-CSIC/SAL-3694]
  3. European Union [EU-CP223111]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Education [AP2008-00105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Promoter-probe and terminator-probe plasmid vectors make possible to rapidly examine whether particular sequences function as promoter or terminator signals in various genetic backgrounds and under diverse environmental stimuli. At present, such plasmid-based genetic tools are very scarce in the Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae and Enterococcus faecalis. Hence, we developed novel promoter-probe and terminator-probe vectors based on the Streptococcus agalactiae pMV158 plasmid, which replicates autonomously in numerous Gram-positive bacteria. As reporter gene, a gfp allele encoding a variant of the green fluorescent protein was used. These genetic tools were shown to be suitable to assess the activity of promoters and terminators (both homologous and heterologous) in S. pneumoniae and E. faecal's. In addition, the promoter-probe vector was shown to be a valuable tool for the analysis of regulated promoters in vivo, such as the promoter of the pneumococcal fuculose kinase gene. These new plasmid vectors will be very useful for the experimental verification of predicted promoter and terminator sequences, as well as for the construction of new inducible-expression vectors. Given the promiscuity exhibited by the pMV158 replicon, these vectors could be used in a variety of Gram-positive bacteria. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据