4.3 Article

One-dimensional metric for tracking bacterial community divergence using sole carbon source utilization patterns

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 79, 期 1, 页码 55-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.07.020

关键词

Euclidean distance; Mesocosm; Phragmites australis; Community level physiological profiling (CLPP); Principle component analysis (PCA); BIOLOG (TM) EcoPlate

资金

  1. NSERC Discovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Community level physiological profiling (CLPP) has become a popular method to characterize and track changes in heterotrophic bacterial communities. Although the CLPP method is a straight forward laboratory protocol which yields large amounts of functional information, the amount of data obtained can become overwhelming and often requires some type of multivariate analysis method for ordination and interpretation. Multivariate analysis can be challenging and requires a significant statistics background along with an understanding of the inferences and biases each multivariate analysis method incurs. This paper presents and evaluates a new approach to analyzing sole carbon source utilization data. A method is described which provides a one-dimensional metric derived from standard CLPP data (BIOLOG (TM) EcoPlate data). The one-dimensional community metric was derived using normalized Euclidean distances and shifts in the carbon source utilization patterns. The one-dimensional community metric did not provide all of the information of classical approaches such as principle component analysis (PCA) or guild grouping analysis: however, it was found to be more easily implemented and interpreted when analyzing the plate data. Validation of this approach is demonstrated using data acquired to track the divergence of bacterial communities in wetland mesocosm systems after an experimentally controlled disturbance. If the objective is to investigate community shifts over time the one-dimensional community divergence metric can be a useful tool. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据