4.7 Article

Gas transport through nanocomposite membrane composed by polyethylene with dispersed graphite nanoplatelets

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 463, 期 -, 页码 196-204

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.065

关键词

Nanocomposite membranes; Low-density polyethylene; Graphite nanoplatelets; Filler-polymer interface; Gas barrier

资金

  1. PAT (Provincia Autonoma di Trento) project (ENAM) [220068/s116]
  2. Institute for Composites and Biomedical Materials of National Research Council (Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gas separation and gas barrier properties of nanocomposite membrane made of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) with dispersed graphite nanoplatelets (GNPs) were studied by gas phase permeation technique. Structural and morphological analyses indicate that in nanocomposites prepared by film blowing technology: (i) the GNPs are iso-oriented with the platelet surface parallel to the membrane surface and (ii) the GNPs inclusion does not change the crystalline It of the polymeric matrix not the size of the LDPE crystallites. The H-2, N-2, and CO2 transport through the nanocomposite membrane was investigated in samples with nominal GNPs content of 5 wt%. The GNPs inclusion reduces the permeability by approximately a factor two compared to that of the pure LDPE membrane for all the examined gases without relevant changes in the gas selectivity properties. Gas transport through the nanocomposite membrane obeys to the solution-diffusion mechanism and shows, for the examined gases, the same value of activation energy for permeation as in the pure LDPE sample. The gas barrier properties of the nanocomposite were compared with those predicted by phenomenological models. The reduced permeability cannot be explained assuming that gas molecules have to cross a tortuous migration path in the polymeric matrix but was instead attributed to the formation of rigidified polymer layers around the GNPs filler particles. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据