4.7 Article

Zwitterionic hydrogel thin films as antifouling surface layers of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes anchored via reactive copolymer additive

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 470, 期 -, 页码 148-158

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.023

关键词

Zwitterionic hydrogel; Polyethersulfone membrane; Anti-fouling; Hemocompatibility

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51273176]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program of China) [2012AA03A602]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Sci & Tech Plan of China [2010C31028]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014QNA4038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fabrication and properties of anti-fouling and hemocompatible polyethersulfone (PES) membranes having zwitterionic hydrogel thin films as surface layers were described in this paper. PES membranes containing a reactive block copolymer PES-b-PHEDMA as an additive were first prepared by traditional non-solvent induced phase separation process. The hydrogel thin films were then grafted from membrane surface by free radical cross-linking polymerization participated by reactive ethylenic bonds in the PES-b-PHEDMA additive. The analysis of attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirmed the successful immobilization of zwitterionic hydrogel thin films on PES membrane surfaces. Due to the hydrophilic and low-fouling characteristics of zwitterionic surfaces, the hydrogel-modified PES membranes showed significantly improved anti-fouling ability. More importantly, the zwitterionic membranes exhibited excellent hemocompatibility and the hydrogel thin films showed good durability in long-term tests. This work provides us with a facile and versatile strategy of covalently anchoring hydrogel thin films onto polymer membranes to achieve excellent anti-fouling properties and hemocompatibility. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据