4.7 Article

Separation of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) from ternary gas mixtures using commercial polysulfone (PSf) hollow fiber membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 452, 期 -, 页码 311-318

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.044

关键词

Gas separation; Sulfur hexafluoride; Ternary gas mixture; Polysulfone hollow fiber membrane; Operational conditions

资金

  1. Energy Efficiency and Resources RAMP
  2. D Program under the Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of Korea [2012T100100528]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea
  4. Korean Government (Ministry of Science, ICT AMP
  5. Future Planning)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The separation of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), a powerful anthropogenic greenhouse gas, was investigated using membrane technology. Permeation measurements in commercial polysulfone (PSf) hollow fiber membranes were performed using single gases (i.e. N-2, O-2 and SF6) to investigate the effect of temperature and pressure on separation performance. The permeation experiments of ternary gas mixtures (N-2/O-2/SF6) were also conducted under various operational conditions, including pressure, temperature, stage cot (permeation flow rate/feed flow rate) and gas compositions. The results showed that the SF6 treatment capacity increased with increase in temperature or pressure, but decreased with increasing stage cut and SF6 content in the feed gas mixture. At higher temperatures, the membrane exhibited higher performance for the separation, recovery and enrichment of SF6. A feed with a higher pressure or a lower stage cut resulted in lower SF6 separation and enrichment efficiency, but a higher recovery. The separation of SF6 from a gas mixture with higher contents of SF6 exhibited lower SF6 recovery and enrichment performance. Our current work demonstrated more realistic performance of the commercial PSI hollow fiber membrane for the separation, enrichment and recovery of SF6. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据