4.7 Article

Improved hydrodynamic permeability and antifouling properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes using polydopamine nanoparticles as additives

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 457, 期 -, 页码 73-81

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.043

关键词

Poly(vinylidene fluoride); Polydopamine nanoparticles; Blend membrane; Hydrodynamic permeability; Antifouling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51273176]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (the 863 Program of China) [2012AA03A602]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Sci & Tech Plan of China [2010C31028]
  4. Key Innovation Team for Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province, China [2009R50047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to improve the hydrodynamic permeability and antifouling properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes using bioinspired polydopamine nanoparticles (PDA NPs) as additives during membranes formation. Based on the oxidant-induced polymerization behavior of dopamine, a series of PDA NPs were first prepared in different reaction mediums. Subsequently, the synthesized FDA NPs were used as additives to produce PVDF/PDA blend membranes. Data of water contact angle measurements show that the hydrophilicity of the blend membranes is improved obviously compared with that of the unmodified PVDF membrane. The water permeability and antifouling properties of the PVDF membranes are both enhanced after blending modification as evaluated by protein filtration tests. Results from tensile test indicate that an appropriate amount of PDA NPs is able to improve the toughness of the as-prepared blend membranes. Moreover, the PVDF/PDA blend membranes have satisfying long-term stability in aqueous environment. This strategy can be extended to more polymers and catechol compounds, and allows exploitation of novel functional composites from bioinspired catecholic chemistry and simple blending process. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据