4.7 Article

Use of nanoimprinted surface patterns to mitigate colloidal deposition on ultrafiltration membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 428, 期 -, 页码 598-607

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.059

关键词

Ultrafiltration; Surface pattern; Surface modification; Nanoimprint lithography; Colloidal fouling

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Industry/University Cooperative Research Center for Membrane Science, Engineering and Technology (MAST) at the University of Colorado at Boulder [IIP 1034720]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1034720] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1034710] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flux decline due to membrane fouling prevails in almost all pressure-driven liquid separations. The factors controlling fouling, ranging from surface chemistry to topographic roughness, have been extensively investigated. However, the role of surface patterns, particularly at a submicron scale, on membrane fouling remains unclear. Herein, we demonstrate that submicron patterns can be successfully imprinted onto a commercial polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane surface using nanoimprint lithography (NIL) without sacrificing its permeability properties. The presence of these patterns led to significantly improved deposition resistance during filtration of colloidal silica particle suspensions, as evidenced by a 19-45% increase in the apparent critical flux, with the magnitude dependent on particle size. Post-filtration visualization reveals an intriguing anisotropy in the particle deposition, whereby the degree of anisotropy depends on the orientation angle between the surface pattern and the flow direction of the feed. These results suggest a chemical-free route to post-formation, membrane surface modification. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据