4.7 Article

Ionic conducting ceramic and carbonate dual phase membranes for carbon dioxide separation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 417, 期 -, 页码 174-182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.030

关键词

CO2 permeation; Dual-phase membranes; Oxygen ionic conductivity; Phase change; Wettability

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FE000470]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-0828146]
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. Program of Introducing Talents to University Disciplines [B06006]
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0828146] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A dense membrane consisting of two-phases: molten carbonate for the conduction of carbonate ions and Bi1.5Y0.3Sm0.2O3 (BYS) for the conduction of oxygen ions, was synthesized and used for selective permeation of CO2 at high temperatures. Since CO2 is transported by these membranes provide infinite selectivity for CO2 over other species such as Ar, He or N-2. The dual-phase membranes were synthesized by the direct infiltration molten carbonate into porous BYS supports with internal surface modified with gamma-Al2O3 to improve the wettability. Permeation took a long time to reach a steady state at the initial stage of high temperature CO2 separation due to the reversible phase transform of the oxygen ions conduction phase between the rhombohedral structure and cubic fluorite structure. The CO2 permeation flux for the dual phase membrane increases with increasing temperature (500-650 degrees C) with apparent activation energy for CO2 permeation of 113.4 kJ/mol. The CO2 permeation flux increases with increasing sweep gas flow rate and reaches a value of 0.083 mL/cm(2)/min at 650 degrees C and helium flow rate of 125 mL (STP)/min. The BYS-carbonate membrane offers higher CO2 permeance than carbonate dual-phase membranes with lithium-cobaltite or yttrium stabilized zirconia as the oxygen ionic conducting phase. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据