4.7 Article

Seeding-free synthesis of dense zeolite FAU membranes on 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-functionalized alumina supports

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 389, 期 -, 页码 272-279

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.036

关键词

Molecular sieve membrane; Zeolite FAU membrane; APTES covalent linker; Gas permeation

资金

  1. EU CARENA [263007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A seeding-free synthesis strategy was developed for the preparation of dense and phase-pure zeolite FAU membranes using 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) as covalent linker between the FAU layer and the alumina support. APTES acts as molecular linker for anchoring the FAU precursors onto the support surface to promote the nucleation and the formation of a thin, well intergrown FAU membrane. Additionally, at the pH of zeolite FAU crystallization (about 11), the zeta potential of the alumina support is changed by APTES-treatment from strongly negative to neutral, which will be helpful to reduce the electrostatic rejection between the negatively charged precursor species and the alumina support. The SEM and XRD characterizations indicate that a relative thin but dense and phase-pure FAU zeolite membrane with a thickness of about 2.5 mu m can be formed on the alpha-Al2O3 support after crystallization at 75 degrees C for 24 h, and no cracks, pinholes or other defects are visible in the membrane layer. The zeolite FAU membranes prepared on APTES-modified Al2O3 supports display higher separation selectivities than those prepared on non-modified Al2O3 support. For binary mixtures at 100 degrees C and 1 bar, the mixed gas separation factors of H-2/CO2, H-2/N-2, H-2/CH4 and H-2/C3H8, are found to be 6.5, 6.0, 4.0 and 11.1, respectively, which are higher than the corresponding Knudsen coefficients. Further, relative high H-2 permeances of about 4.0 x 10(-7) mol m(-2) s(-1) pa(-1) can be obtained through the FAU membrane due to the thin layer and the relative wide pores of 0.74 nm. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据