4.7 Article

Durability of PSS-supported Pd-membranes under mixed gas and water-gas shift conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 415, 期 -, 页码 213-220

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.001

关键词

Pd-membrane reactor; Water-gas-shift reaction; Long-term testing; Mixed-gas testing; Reactor performance assessment

资金

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FC26-07NT43058, DE-FE0004895]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The palladium-based catalytic membrane reactor (Pd-CMR) as well as the palladium-based membrane separator have demonstrated a wide ranging applicability to the fields of H-2 production and clean power generation. One of the key requirements in these two application fields remains the synthesis of robust, composite, dense metal membranes which exhibit high H-2 permeance as well as long-term selectivity stability. Within such a context, a porous stainless steel supported thin Pd-membrane with an H-2 permeance of 34 m(3)/m(2)-h-bar(0.5) (400 degrees C) has been prepared and tested under H-2/H2O(10-37%) mixed gas conditions, 2.6-6.1 bar and 400-450 degrees C for up to 190 h. Two similar membranes with H-2 permeance of 23 and 28 m(3)/m(2)-h-bar(0.5), were also tested under water-gas-shift (WGS) reaction conditions (42% CO, 40% H-2, 18% CO2), H2O/CO ratio of 2-3, 7.9-14.7 bar, 400 degrees C and 2700 h(-1) for up to 1000 h. At the highest pressure level a stable CO conversion and H-2 recovery of 97 and 88% respectively were achieved for 900 h which is indicative of the overall system stability. All the membranes exhibited leak growth under mixed and WGS conditions at similar rates (3.1 x 10(-7)-2.2 x 10(-5) m(3)/m(2)-h-bar) as those measured during pure H-2 testing, suggesting that the reactive atmosphere did not permanently harm the dense Pd-layer. Additionally, a significant part of the leak growth that was experimentally observed during the 1000 hour WGS test can be reasonably attributed to defects inherent to the welded regions of the PSS316L supports utilized in the present research study. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据