4.7 Article

Influence of polyvinyl alcohol on the surface morphology, separation and anti-fouling performance of the composite polyamide nanofiltration membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 367, 期 1-2, 页码 158-165

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.060

关键词

Interfacial polymerization; Polyvinyl alcohol; Nanofiltration; Anti-fouling

资金

  1. NNSFC [20606028]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB623402]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Y4100250]
  4. Science Foundation of Chinese University (The Engineering Research Center of Membrane and Water Treatment Technology, Ministry of Education) [KYJD09011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was incorporated into composite nanofiltration membranes in situ by adding different amounts of PVA into piperazine (PIP) during its interfacial polymerization with trimesoyl chloride (TMC). Effect of PVA on membrane structures, nanofiltration performances and anti-fouling properties was studied by X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and cross-flow membrane module. It was found that the flux was increased without sacrificing rejection after adding PVA. XPS results show that the active layer contains PVA and polyamide components. AFM and SEM show that the roughness of these membranes decreases proportionally with increasing the mass fraction of PVA to PIP (the root mean square roughness value (RMS) decreases from 110.7 nm to 41.6 nm after adding 16% PVA). The hydrophilicity and flux of the composite NF membranes also increase with increasing the mass fraction of PVA to PIP. Moreover, the anti-fouling performance of composite polyamide NF membranes is improved with introducing the PVA into membranes. Therefore, PVA as an additive reagent has the potential to improve the nanofiltration performance of polyamide composite membranes. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据