4.7 Article

Ammonia-activated mesoporous carbon membranes for gas separations

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 368, 期 1-2, 页码 41-47

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.007

关键词

Mesoporous carbon; Membrane; Gas Separations

资金

  1. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory by the Division of Scientific User Facilities, U.S. Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous carbon membranes, which generally show improved chemical and thermal stability compared to polymer membranes, have been used in gas separations for many years. In this work, we show that the post-synthesis ammonia treatment of porous carbon at elevated temperature can improve the permeance and selectivity of these membranes for the separation of carbon dioxide and hydrocarbons from permanent gases. Hierarchically structured porous carbon membranes were exposed to ammonia gas at temperatures ranging from 850 degrees C to 950 degrees C for up to 10 min and the N(2), CO(2), and C(3)H(6) permeances were. measured for these different membranes. Higher treatment temperatures and longer exposure times resulted in higher gas permeance values. In addition, CO(2)/N(2) and C(3)H(6)/N(2) selectivities increased by a factor of 2 as the treatment temperature and time increased up to a temperature and time of 900 degrees C, 10 min. Higher temperatures showed increased permeance but decreased selectivity indicating excess pore activation. Nitrogen adsorption measurements show that the ammonia treatment increased the porosity of the membrane while elemental analysis revealed the presence of nitrogen-containing surface functionalities in the treated carbon membranes. Thus, ammonia treatment at high temperature provides a controlled method to introduce both added microporosity and surface functionality to enhance gas separations performance of porous carbon membranes. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据