4.7 Article

Processing and oxygen permeation studies of asymmetric multilayer Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 380, 期 1-2, 页码 68-80

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.034

关键词

BSCF; Surface oxygen exchange; Asymmetric membrane; Oxygen permeation; Surface activation

资金

  1. Belgian Federal Science Policy foundation (FOD )
  2. FCT, Portugal [PTDC/CTM/64357/2006, SFRH/BD/45227/2008, SFRH/BPD/28913/2006, SFRH/BPD/28629/2006]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/45227/2008, SFRH/BPD/28913/2006, SFRH/BPD/28629/2006] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The oxygen transport studies of dense Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-delta (BSCF) ceramic membranes, prepared via glycine-nitrate route, demonstrated that the permeation rate is predominantly controlled by surface exchange kinetics when the membrane thickness is smaller than 1.00 mm. In order to improve oxygen exchange, an asymmetric membrane concept including two porous and one dense layer was implemented. The amount of graphite as a pore-forming additive, powder compaction and sintering conditions were optimized to produce three-layer membranes having appropriate mechanical strength and microstructure. Comparison of the data on oxygen permeation through three-layer and dense 1.00 mm thick symmetric membranes indicated that a moderate improvement of the overall performance was achieved due to asymmetric architecture. The oxygen fluxes through membrane with 170 mu m thick dense and porous layers with thicknesses of 1.05 mm and 100 mu m at 1173 K were found to be similar to 1.5-1.8 times higher than those for a 1.00 mm thick symmetric membrane. The variation of oxygen flux changes with pressure and the values of the activation energies for oxygen permeation suggest significant gas diffusion limitations in the porous layers, whilst the role of other factors is still significant. Microstructure of the porous layers requires further optimization for successful application of the oxygen exchange catalysts. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据