4.7 Article

Novel postsulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)-block-poly(ether sulfone)s as proton exchange membranes for fuel cells: Design, preparation and properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 380, 期 1-2, 页码 171-180

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.004

关键词

Block polymer; Polycondensation; Sulfonation; Phase separation; Fuel cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50973040]
  2. Science and Technology Development Plan of Jilin Province, China [20100706]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry [3C1116801412]
  4. Jilin University [421031561412]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two series of poly(ether ether ketone)-block-poly(ether sulfone) (PEEK-b-PES) polymer precursors are successfully synthesized via two-step aromatic nucleophilic polycondensation reactions. Corresponding sulfonated PEEK-b-PES copolymers are prepared by the direct postsulfonation of the PEEK-b-PES precursors, and the activated methoxy groups enable the sulfonation occurrence on the PEEK segments. The degrees of sulfonation are evaluated by (1)H NMR spectroscopy and titration. All the membranes exhibit excellent thermal and dimensional stability, high proton conductivity and low methanol permeability. At 80 degrees C. the higher proton conductivities (>0.20 S cm(-1)) of the block polymers can be obtained in comparison with Nafion 117 (0.17 S cm(-1)). The methanol permeability values of the obtained membranes are in the range of 0.63-9.60 x 10(-7) cm(2) s(-1), which are much lower than the value of Nafion 117 (2.94 x 10(-6) cm(2) s(-1)). The TEM images of the block polymer membranes exhibit obvious phase separation morphology between ionic domains and hydrophobic domains. All the data prove that these block membranes obtained by the postsulfonation of block polymer precursors may be potential proton exchange membrane for fuel cells applications. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据