4.7 Article

Effect of chitosan as a functionalization agent on the performance and separation properties of polyimide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix flat sheet membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 364, 期 1-2, 页码 309-317

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.023

关键词

Gas separation; MMMs; Multi-walled carbon nanotube; Functionalization; Chitosan

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Malaysia [03-01-06-SF0085]
  2. National Iranian Gas Company [087125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of chitosan as a functionalization agent on the performance and separation properties of polyimide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix flat sheet membranes were investigated. Polyimide (PI)/raw multi-walled carbon nanotubes (r-MWCNTs) and polyimide (PI)/chitosan-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (C-f-MWCNTs) mixed matrix membranes were fabricated by phase inversion method. Raw and functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes were characterized by transmission electron microscope (TEM). The membrane samples were characterized by SEM, FESEM, DSC and gas permeation tests using He, CO2 and CH4 as test gases. TEM results and gas permeation test using He as test gas showed that r-MWCNTs were generally closed ended and after functionalization, well dispersed open ended chitosan-wrapped MWCNTs were obtained. Gas permeation results showed that addition of 1 wt.% (solid base) C-f-MWCNTs into casting dope can increase the CO2 and CH4 permeabilities by 20.48 and 0.71 Barter, respectively. The increase in permeabilities of CO2, CH4 and He in this study can be attributed to the presence of high diffusivity tunnels in the MWCNTs within the polyimide matrix. It is interesting that the CO2/CH4 selectivity was also increased by 51.4% (from 10.9 to 16.5) by addition of C-f-MWCNTs. DSC and FESEM results also revealed a very good dispersion and adhesion of the C-f-MWCNTs in the polyimide matrix. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据