4.7 Article

Fabrication and characterization of a carbon electrode coated with cation-exchange polymer for the membrane capacitive deionization applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 355, 期 1-2, 页码 85-90

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.010

关键词

Membrane capacitive deionization; Carbon electrode; Cation-exchange polymer; Specific capacitance; Cyclic voltammetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A carbon electrode coated with cation-exchange polymer was fabricated in a simple and inexpensive way for applications in membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI). A mixture of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and sulfosuccinic acid (SSA) was used as a coating solution to introduce negatively charged ion-exchange groups. The PVA/SSA-coated carbon electrodes were fabricated at different crosslinking temperatures and SSA contents. The prepared electrodes were characterized by SEM, FTIR analysis, cyclic voltammetry and electrical impedance spectroscopy. The PVA/SSA coating layer showed high adhesion to the carbon powders. The SSA was effectively introduced as a crosslinking agent and cation-exchange groups, as shown in the FTIR spectra. Cyclic voltammetry analysis indicated that the specific capacitance was increased by coating the carbon electrode with PVA/SSA polymer solution. The specific capacitances of the coated electrode were enhanced by 14.8-30.9% compared with the uncoated one, depending on the crosslinking temperature. The increased capacitance of the coated electrode is attributed to the fixed ion concentration in the PVA/SSA coating layer. The electric resistance and specific capacitance of the coated carbon electrodes were affected strongly by the crosslinking temperature due to the altered degree of crosslinking. The area resistances of the coating layer were in the range of 0.67-1.17 Omega cm(2), depending on the crosslinking temperature and SSA content, which is relatively low when compared with commercial ion-exchange membranes. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据