4.7 Article

Modification of cellulose acetate membrane via low-pressure plasma polymerization for sugar separation applications: Part I. Membrane development and characterization

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 350, 期 1-2, 页码 310-321

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.01.006

关键词

Membrane; Separation; Plasma polymerization; Bioreactor systems; Ethylenediamine

资金

  1. Scientific Research Fund of Yuzuncu Yil University [2008-FBE-D011]
  2. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [1060116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to illustrate the low-pressure plasma modified cellulose acetate (CA) membranes can display a fractionation capability that can be of major importance for the operation of continuous enzymatic membrane reactors. For this purpose, low-frequency (LF) and/or radio-frequency (RF) excitations were applied to coat ethylenediamine (EDA) monomer to alter physico-chemical characteristics of surface as well as narrowing pore size of CA type common ultrafiltration membrane. Membrane characteristics were evaluated using various physical and chemical techniques including contact angle, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy with Horizontal Attenuated Total Reflection attachment and scanning electron microscopy. Membrane performance based on efficient monosaccharide removal was tested by using a diffusion cell. The contact angle results showed that the grafted amino groups caused great increase on the polar nature of the CA membranes studied. A complete and permanent hydrophilic modification of a CA was achieved by LF plasma treatment. From the fractionation point of view, 120 W and 10 min seemed to be a better plasma condition for membrane modification using LF plasma system. Very high retention (>94%) was obtained with the LF/PIzP-modified CA membrane for disaccharides, while the retention for monosaccharides was rather low (<73%) at the same reaction time. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据