4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of crosslinked poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels as fouling-resistant membrane coating materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 330, 期 1-2, 页码 180-188

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.12.054

关键词

Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate; Crosslinking; Membrane fouling; Ultrafiltration

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N-000-140510771, N-000-140510158]
  2. National Science Foundation [CTS-0554109, CBET-0553957]
  3. Department of Energy [DE-FC26-64NT15547]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A family of crosslinked poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (XLPEGDA) materials was synthesized via free-radical photopolymerization of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) solutions in water. These materials are potential fouling-resistant coatings for ultrafiltration (UF) membranes. PEGDA chain length (n = 10-45, where n is the average number of ethylene oxide units in the PEGDA molecule) and water content in the prepolymerization mixture (0-80 wt.%) were varied, resulting in XLPEGDA materials with water permeability values ranging from 0.5 to 150 L mu M/(m(2) h bar). Generally, water permeability increased with increasing prepolymerization water content and with increasing PEGDA chain length. Moreover, water permeability exhibits a strong correlation with equilibrium water uptake. However, solute rejection, probed using poly(ethylene glycol)s of well defined molar mass, decreased with increasing prepolymerization water content and increasing PEGDA chain length. That is, there is a tradeoff between water permeability and separation properties. Finally. the fouling resistance of XLPEGDA materials was characterized via contact angle measurements and static protein adhesion experiments. From these results, XLPEGDA surfaces are more hydrophilic in samples prepared at higher prepolymerization water content or with longer PEGDA chains, and the more hydrophilic surfaces generally exhibit less BSA accumulation. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据