4.7 Article

Nanofiltration membranes synthesized from hyperbranched polyethyleneimine

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 326, 期 1, 页码 19-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.021

关键词

Zwitterionic; Nanofiltration; Interfacial polymerization; Zeta potential; Electrostatic repulsion

资金

  1. Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA)
  2. Technology Development Program for Academia (TDPA)
  3. National Science Council (NSC)
  4. Center-of-Excellence (COE)
  5. Program on Membrane Technology from the Ministry of Education (MOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four nanofiltration membranes, two negatively and two positively charged, were fabricated by interfacial polymerization. Three different amines, ethylenediamine (EDA), diethylenetriamine (DETA), and hyperbranched polyethyleneimine (PEI) were selected to react with two acyl chlorides, trimesoyl chloride (TMC) and terephthaloyl chloride (TPC). The two membranes containing hyperbranched PEI, PEI/TPC and PEI/TMC, are positively charged at the operational pH. But the other two membranes, EDA/TMC and DETA/TMC, are negatively charged. It is found that the two PEI membranes own special rejection characters during nanofiltration. The PEI/TPC membrane has a similar pore size to the EDA/TMC membrane but owns simultaneously the higher salt rejection and permeation flux. The PEI/TMC has a pore size as large as 1.5 nm and still has a higher NaCl rejection than the EDA/TMC membrane of which the pore size as small as 0.43 nm. We consider that the special rejection characters are derived from the special structure of PEI. The hyperbranched structure allows some of the charged amine groups drifting inside the pores and interacting with the ions in the pathway. The drifting amines increase salt rejection but have little effect on water permeation. It implies that a high flux and high rejection membrane for desalting can be obtained by attaching freely rotating charged groups. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据