4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of PVDF/TiO2 organic-inorganic composite membranes for fouling resistance improvement

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 345, 期 1-2, 页码 13-20

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.003

关键词

Phase inversion method; PVDF/TiO2; Fouling resistance; Composite membrane; Modified fouling index (MFI)

资金

  1. Kyung Hee University Research Fund [KHU-20080653]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0088941] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) ultrafiltration (UF) membrane was modified by dispersing nano-sized titanium(IV) oxide (TiO2) particles in a PVDF solution. PVDF flat-sheet membranes were fabricated by a phase inversion method. Nonwoven fabric and PET film were used as the support layer. This study investigates the effect of TiO2 nanoparticles, type of coagulants, and support layers on membrane permeability. The experimental result indicates that the membrane surface can be modified by adding TiO2 nanoparticles, coagulant solvent compositions, and support materials. PVDF membrane fouling was reduced by changing the membrane surface from hydrophobic to hydrophilic after TiO2 addition. PVDF membranes immersed in pure water coagulation bath solution revealed typical large finger-like structures; however, when water/isopropanol mixtures were used as the coagulant solvent, PVDF membranes exhibited sponge-like structures instead of finger-like structures. By using the PET film (instead of non-woven fabric) as the support layer, excessive penetration of the cast solution into the support layer could be prevented. However, a dense PET film obstructed the exchange of polymer solution and coagulation bath solution and therefore small pores were formed due to a slow membrane formation process. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据