4.7 Article

Removal of cadmium ions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration with mixed anionic-nonionic surfactants

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 326, 期 2, 页码 303-309

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.013

关键词

Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration; Cadmium ions (Cd2+); Surfactant; Micelles; Rejection efficiency

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [50608028]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education,
  3. National 863 High Technologies Research Foundation of China [2004AA649370]
  4. National Basic Research Program [2005CB724203]
  5. Natural Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [50425927, 50225926]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) was used to remove cadmium ions from wastewater efficiently. in this study the nonionic surfactants polyoxyethyleneglycol dodecyl ether (Brij35) and polyoxyethylene octyl phenyl ether (TritonX-100) were for micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration to lower the dosage of the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The surfactant critical micelle concentration (CMC) and the degree of micelle counterion binding were investigated. The effects of nonionic surfactant addition on the efficiency of cadmium removal, the residual quantities of surfactant, the permeate flux and the secondary membrane resistance were investigated. A comparison between MEUF with SDS and MEUF with mixed anionic-nonionic surfactants was undertaken. The results show that the addition of BriJ35 or TritonX-100 reduced the CMC of SDS and the degree of counterion binding for the micelles. Due to these variations the Cd2+ rejection efficiency was at a maximum when the Brij35:SDS and the TritonX-100:SDS molar ratio was 0.5. The Cd2+ rejection efficiency in MEUF with SDS is higher than for MEUF with mixed surfactants when the total dose of surfactant is constant. The permeate flux of MEUF with SDS is higher than that for MEUF with mixed surfactants while the secondary resistance of MEUF with SDS is less than that of MEUF with mixed surfactants. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据