4.1 Article

Induced Transmembrane Voltage and Its Correlation with Electroporation-Mediated Molecular Transport

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE BIOLOGY
卷 236, 期 1, 页码 3-13

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00232-010-9279-9

关键词

Induced transmembrane voltage; Electroporation; Transmembrane transport; Isolated cell; Cell suspension; Cell cluster; Di-8-ANEPPS; Propidium iodide

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [Z2-9227, P2-0249]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure of a cell to an electric field results in inducement of a voltage across its membrane (induced transmembrane voltage, Delta I (m)) and, for sufficiently strong fields, in a transient increase of membrane permeability (electroporation). We review the analytical, numerical and experimental methods for determination of Delta I (m) and a method for monitoring of transmembrane transport. We then combine these methods to investigate the correlation between Delta I (m) and molecular transport through an electroporated membrane for isolated cells of regular and irregular shapes, for cells in dense suspensions as well as for cells in monolayer clusters. Our experiments on isolated cells of both regular and irregular shapes confirm the theoretical prediction that the highest absolute values of Delta I (m) are found in the membrane regions facing the electrodes and that electroporation-mediated transport is confined to these same regions. For cells in clusters, the location of transport regions implies that, at the field strengths sufficient for electroporation, the cells behave as electrically insulated (i.e., as individual) cells. In contrast, with substantially weaker, nonelectroporating fields, potentiometric measurements show that the cells in these same clusters behave as electrically interconnected cells (i.e., as one large cell). These results suggest that sufficiently high electric fields affect the intercellular pathways and thus alter the electric behavior of the cells with respect to their normal physiological state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据