4.1 Article

PKA Mediates Constitutive Activation of CFTR in Human Sweat Duct

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE BIOLOGY
卷 231, 期 2-3, 页码 65-78

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00232-009-9205-1

关键词

CFTR; Delta F508 CFTR; R117H CFTR; PKA; PKG; G proteins; Glutamate; alpha-toxin; Okadaic acid

资金

  1. NIH [RO1 DE14352, RO1HL08042, 1R01 HL 096732-01, R01 DK 55835-09]
  2. Nancy Olmsted Trust
  3. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  4. [USPHSR01 DK 51889]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) Cl- channels are constitutively activated in sweat ducts. Since phosphorylation-dependent and -independent mechanisms can activate CFTR, we sought to determine the actual mechanism responsible for constitutive activation of these channels in vivo. We show that the constitutively activated CFTR Cl- conductance (gCFTR) in the apical membrane is completely deactivated following alpha-toxin permeabilization of the basolateral membrane. We investigated whether such inhibition of gCFTR following permeabilization is due to the loss of cytoplasmic glutamate or due to dephosphorylation of CFTR by an endogenous phosphatase in the absence of kinase activity (due to the loss of kinase agonist cAMP, cGMP or GTP through alpha-toxin pores). In order to distinguish between these two possibilities, we examined the effect of inhibiting the endogenous phosphatase activity with okadaic acid (10(-8) M) on the permeabilization-induced deactivation of gCFTR. We show that okadaic acid (1) inhibits an endogenous phosphatase responsible for dephosphorylating cAMP but not cGMP or G protein-activated CFTR and (2) prevents deactivation of CFTR following permeabilization of the basolateral membrane. These results indicate that distinctly different phosphatases may be responsible for dephosphorylating different kinase-specific sites on CFTR. We conclude that the phosphorylation by PKA alone appears to be primarily responsible for constitutive activation of gCFTR in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据