4.6 Article

Regional white matter development in very preterm infants: perinatal predictors and early developmental outcomes

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 79, 期 1, 页码 87-95

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2015.172

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [R01 HD057098, UL1 TR000448, KL2TR000450, K02 NS089852]
  2. McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience, St Louis, Missouri
  3. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at Washington University (NIH/NICHD Bethesda, Maryland) [P30 HD062171]
  4. Child Neurology Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  5. Doris Duke Foundation, New York, New York

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants are at risk for white matter (WM) injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. METHODS: Serial diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging data were obtained from very preterm infants (N = 78) born <30 wk gestation imaged up to four times from 26-42 wk post menstrual age. Slopes were calculated for fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) within regions of interest for infants with >= 2 scans (N = 50). Sixty-five children underwent neurodevelopmental testing at 2 y of age. RESULTS: FA slope for the posterior limb of the internal capsule was greater than other regions. the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC), corpus callosum, and optic radiations demonstrated greater FA slope with increasing gestational age. Infants with patent ductus arteriosus had lower FA slope in the ALIC. MD slope was lower with prolonged ventilation or lack of antenatal steroids. At 2 y of age, lower motor scores were associated with lower FA in the left but higher FA in the right inferior temporal lobe at term-equivalent age. Better social emotional competence was related to lower FA in the left cingulum bundle. CONCLUSION:This study demonstrates regional variability in the susceptibility/sensitivity of WM maturation to perinatal factors and relationships between altered diffusion measures and developmental outcomes in preterm neonates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据