4.4 Article

Radical Quenching Activity, Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power, and Ferrous Ion-Chelating Capacity of 16 Ballota Species and Their Total Phenol and Flavonoid Contents

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL FOOD
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 1537-1543

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2009.0237

关键词

antioxidant; Ballota; ferric-reducing power; Lamiaceae; metal chelating; radical quenching; total phenols and flavonoids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ethyl acetate, methanol, and water extracts of 16 Ballota species (Family Lamiaceae)-Ballota acetabulosa, Ballota antalyanse, Ballota cristata, Ballota glandulosissima, Ballota inaequidens, Ballota larendana, Ballota latibracteolata, Ballota macrodonta, Ballota nigra ssp. anatolica, B. nigra ssp. foetida, B. nigra ssp. nigra, B. nigra ssp. uncinata, Ballota pseudodictamnus ssp. lycia, Ballota rotundifolia, Ballota saxatilis ssp. brachyodonta, and B. saxatilis subsp. saxatilis-were screened for their 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical quenching, ferric-reducing antioxidant power, and ferrous ion-chelating capacity at 1 mg/mL. Hispanolone, a major diterpene found in the Ballota genus, was also tested in the same manner. Total phenol and flavonoid contents of the extracts were determined by Folin-Ciocalteau and AlCl3 reagents, respectively. The extracts showed insignificant quenching activity against DPPH radical, but they had moderate antioxidant activity (0.597 +/- 0.03 to 1.342 +/- 0.01) in the ferric-reducing test compared to chlorogenic acid (the reference compound) (3.618 +/- 0.01). All of the extracts (ranging from 65.1 +/- 0.64% to 96.3 +/- 0.09%) and hispanolone (97.31 +/- 0.30%) exerted a remarkable ferrous ion-chelating effect. The highest total phenol (gallic acid equivalent) and flavonoid (quercetin equivalent) contents were found in the ethyl acetate extract of B. glandulosissima (393.7 +/- 3.03 and 140.6 +/- 1.97 mg/g of extract, respectively). Therefore, Ballota species could be a good source of natural preservatives in foodstuffs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据