4.7 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Iodinated Tetrahydroquinolines Targeting the G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor GPR30

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 53, 期 3, 页码 1004-1014

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm9011802

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 CA 127731, CA116662, U54MH074425, U54MH084690]
  2. University of New Mexico Cancer Research and Treatment Center (NIH) [P30 CA118100]
  3. New Mexico Cowboys for Cancer Research Foundation
  4. Oxnard Foundation
  5. Stranahan Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of iodo-substituted tetrahydro-3H-cyclopenta[c]quinolines was synthesized as potential targeted imaging agents for the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPR30. The affinity and specificity of binding to GPR30 versus the classical estrogen receptors ER alpha/beta and functional responses associated with ligand-binding were determined. Selected iodo-substituted tetrahydro-3H-cyclopenta[c]quinolines exhibited IC50 values lower than 20 nM in competitive binding studies with GPR30-expressing human endometrial cancer cells. These compounds functioned as antagonists of GPR30 and blocked estrogen-induced PI3K activation and calcium mobilization. The tributylstannyl precursors of selected compounds were radiolabeled with I-125 using the iodogen method. In vivo biodistribution studies in female ovariectomized athymic (NCr) nu/nu mice bearing GPR30-expressing human endometrial tumors revealed GPR30-mediated uptake of the radiotracer ligands in tumor, adrenal, and reproductive organs. Biodistribution and quantitative SPECT/CT studies revealed structurally related differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles, target tissue uptake, and metabolism of the radiolabeled compounds as well as differences in susceptibility to deiodination. The high lipophilicity of the compounds adversely affects the in vivo biodistribution and clearance of these radioligands and suggests that further optimization of this parameter may lead to improved targeting characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据