4.7 Article

Ability of inactivated vaccines based on far-eastern tick-borne encephalitis virus strains to induce humoral immune response in originally seropositive and seronegative recipients

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 91, 期 2, 页码 190-200

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25316

关键词

adverse event (AE); body mass index (BMI); sex; postvaccinal immune response; vaccination

类别

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [15-14-00048]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [15-14-00048] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) remains one of the major public health concerns in northern Eurasia, and its' area is expanding. TBE virus (TBEV) includes three subtypes and several monophyletic groups, cocirculating in Russia. Five inactivated vaccines are used for TBE prophylaxis. The rising number of people subjected to vaccination brings up the issue of the impact of individual recipient characteristics on vaccination efficacy. The present work studies correlations among the vaccination scheme, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), chronic diseases, postvaccinal reaction, pre-existing anti-TBEV antibodies, and postvaccinal humoral immunity development. Sera were collected during clinical trials in the TBEV Siberian subtype endemic area. Adult recipients were vaccinated with Tick-E-Vac and EnceVir vaccines based on Far-Eastern TBEV strains. Vaccine ability to induce humoral immunity in different categories of recipients was estimated by seroconversion rates and the percentage of recipients with high neutralizing antibody titers (>= 1:500). High immunogenicity of vaccines based on Far-Eastern TBEV strains in the TBEV Siberian subtype endemic area in all groups of recipients was demonstrated. Impact of pre-existing contact with the virus and high BMI on humoral immune response development 14 days after the first immunization was evidenced. Nevertheless, the difference was significantly less pronounced 30 days after the first vaccination and undetectable after the second one.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据