4.7 Article

Review: Laboratory Diagnosis and Surveillance of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 87, 期 1, 页码 175-186

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.24004

关键词

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; transmissible spongiform encephalopathy; prion disease; surveillance; diagnosis

类别

资金

  1. Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [4835-301-210-13]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea
  3. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A1A2043356]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1A2043356] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is a representative human transmissible spongiform encephalopathy associated with central nervous system degeneration. Prions, the causative agents of CJD, are composed of misfolded prion proteins and are able to self-replicate. While CJD is a rare disease affecting only 1-1.5 people per million worldwide annually, it has attracted both scientific and public attention as a threatening disease since an epidemic of variant CJD (vCJD) cases appeared in the mid-1990s. Due to its unconventional transmission and invariable fatality, CJD poses a serious risk to public health. The hundreds of sporadic, genetic, and iatrogenic CJD cases as well as potential zoonotic transmission suggest that CJD is an ongoing concern for the field of medicine. Nevertheless, treatment aimed at clinical prevention and treatment that reverses the course of disease does not exist currently. Active surveillance and effective laboratory diagnosis of CJD are, therefore, critical. In this report, the surveillance systems and laboratory tests used currently to diagnose CJD in different countries are reviewed. The current efforts to improve surveillance and diagnosis for CJD using molecular and biochemical findings are also described. J. Med. Virol. 87: 175-186, 2015. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据