4.7 Article

Association of Intrahepatic cccDNA Reduction With the Improvement of Liver Histology in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving Oral Antiviral Agents

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 83, 期 4, 页码 602-607

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.22014

关键词

adefovir dipivoxil; entecavir; hepatitis B virus; virus titer

类别

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 94-2314-B-006-106, NSC 96-2628-B-006-039-MY3]
  2. National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan [A0042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is difficult to eradicate using current antiviral therapy. This study compares cccDNA reduction with relation to liver histology in nucleoside/nucleotide-naive chronic hepatitis B patients receiving oral antiviral mono-therapy (n = 35), including entecavir (ETV, n = 13), adefovir dipivoxil (ADV, n = 22) or placebo (n = 14). Serum HBV DNA, intrahepatic total HBV DNA and cccDNA are quantified. Histological hepatic examination is performed at baseline and at 48 weeks of treatment. Treatment with ETV or ADV shows significant median reduction in serum HBV DNA (-6.21 and -4.27 log(10) copies/mL) and intrahepatic total HBV DNA (-1.69 and -1.23 log(10) copies/cell). Intrahepatic cccDNA levels are reduced slightly in the ETV and the ADV groups, but do not differ statistically from the placebo group (-0.17 vs. -0.01 vs. 0.02 copies/cell). Only the level of intrahepatic cccDNA correlates with Knodell necroinflammation activity (r = 0.527, P < 0.001) and Ishak fibrosis severity (r = 0.348, P = 0.015) before treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicates that treatment-induced cccDNA reduction is associated with improved necroinflammation (P= 0.041) and fibrosis (P= 0.026). In conclusion, baseline intrahepatic cccDNA loads correlate with histologic activity. Although one-year ETV or ADV treatment is insufficient for cccDNA eradication, oral antiviral therapies may improve liver histology, probably by suppressing intrahepatic cccDNA. J. Med. Virol. 83:602-607, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据