4.7 Article

Characterization of Common and Rare Human Papillomaviruses in Portuguese Women by the Polymerase Chain Reaction, Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism and Sequencing

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 82, 期 6, 页码 1024-1032

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21756

关键词

Portugal/epidemiology; Papillomaviridae; genotyping; polymerase chain reaction, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis

类别

资金

  1. Portuguese Research Council (FCT) [SFRH/BD/19165/2004]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/19165/2004] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study aimed to provide additional information on the prevalence of mucosal human papillomavirus (HPV) types in Portuguese women by using polymerase chain reaction, restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing. HPV was detected in 15.5% (15/97) of the control samples, 23.5% (12/51) of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 52.8% (28/53) of low-grade lesions, 82.4% (28/34) of high-grade lesions, and 100% (44/44) of carcinomas. Overall, 28 HPV types were detected. 11 high-risk (HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 52, 56, 58, and 59), 3 probable high-risk (HPV 53, 66, and 73), 6 low-risk (HPV 6, 11, 44, 61, 70, and 81), and 8 unknown-risk types (HPV 34, 62, 67, 71, 83, 84, 102, and 108) The most prevalent type was HPV 16, detected in 33.8% of women infected with HPV, followed by HPV 58 (9.2%), HPV 33 (7.0%), HPV 18 (6.3%), HPV 53 (5 6%), HPV 31 and 56 (49% each), HPV 6 (3.5%), and HPV 66 and 81 (2.8% each) Of 44 cervical carcinoma samples, 71% were associated with HPV 16 (60%) and HPV 18 (11.1%), followed by the high-risk types 33 (11.1%), 35 (4.4%), 45 (4 4%), and 56 (2.2%), the probable high-risk type 53 (4.4%) and the unknown-risk type 67 (2.2%). This study provides information on the most common HPV types in Portuguese women and suggests that the current prophylactic HPV 16/18 vaccine may be useful for the prevention of cervical cancer in this population. J. Med. Viral. 82:1024-1032, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据