4.7 Article

The prevalence of hepatitis B virus preS deletions occurring naturally in Korean patients infected chronically with genotype C

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 80, 期 7, 页码 1189-1194

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21208

关键词

hepatitis B virus (HBV); preS deletions; prevalence; genotype C; HBeAg serostatus

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although Korea is one of the endemic areas for hepatitis B virus infection (HBV), the prevalence of deletions in HBV preS region occurring naturally have not been determined. In the present study, the prevalence of preS deletions was determined in terms of clinical state and HBeAg serostatus in 120 patients with different clinical features [59 HBeAg positive, 61 HBeAg negative; 38 asymptomatic carriers, 21 patients with chronic hepatitis, 21 patients with liver cirrhosis, 40 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)]. A total of 37 strains (30.8%) harbored deletions in the preS region. Overall, the frequencies of preS deletions tended to increase gradually according to the degree of the clinical severity of liver disease. The prevalence of preS1 deletions in HCC patients tended to be higher than in patients with liver cirrhosis (32.5% vs. 19%). The prevalence of preS2 deletions in HBeAg negative patients was significantly higher than in HBeAg positive patients (23% vs. 6.8%). The type of deletion encountered most frequently was one disrupting the preS1 start codon [14/37 strains (37.8%)], which showed a very high prevalence in HCC patients (9/40, 22.5%; HCC vs. asymptomatic carriers, P=0.048). These results suggest that there might be the discrepancy between preS1 and preS2 mutations in the mechanism of enhancing the progression of chronic liver disease, especially the development of HCC and to maintain tolerance during the stage of immune tolerance. Specific deletion of the type disrupting preSi start codon may play important roles in hepatocarcinogenesis, at least in Korean patients with chronic HBV infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据