4.3 Article

Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance genes among blood and urinary Escherichia coli isolates

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 1707-1713

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.062653-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Fund for the Control of Infectious Diseases (RFCID) of the Health and Food Bureau of the Hong Kong SAR Government
  2. Consultancy Service for Enhancing Laboratory Surveillance of Emerging Infectious Disease for the HKSAR Department of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A total of 1878 non-duplicate clinical Escherichia coli isolates (comprising 1711 urinary isolates and 167 blood-culture isolates), which were collected from multiple centres in Hong Kong during 1996-2008, were used to investigate the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of plasmid-mediated fosfomycin (fos) resistance genes. Eighteen of the 1878 clinical E. coli isolates were fosfomycin resistant, of which six were fosA3 positive and two were positive for another fosA variant (designated fosKP96). No isolates had the fosC2 gene. The clones of the eight isolates were diverse: sequence type (ST) 95 (n=2), ST118 (n=1), ST131 (n=1), ST617 (n=1), ST648 (n=1), ST1488 (n=1) and ST2847 (n=1). In the isolates, fosA3 and bla(CTX-M) genes were co-harboured on conjugative plasmids with F2:A-:B- (n=2), N (n=1), F-:A-:B1 and N (n=1) and untypable (n=2) replicons. Both fosKP96-carrying plasmids belonged to replicon N. RFLP analysis showed that the two F2:A-:B- plasmids carrying fosA3 and bfa(CTX-M-3) genes shared the same pattern. Complete sequencing of one of the two F2:A-:B- plasmids, pFOS-HK151325 (69 768 bp) demonstrated it to be >99% identical to the previously sequenced plasmid pHK23a originating from a pig E. coli isolate in the same region. This study demonstrated the dissemination of fosA3 genes in diverse E. coli clones on multiple bla(CTX-M)-carrying plasmid types, of which F2:A-:B- plasmids closely related to pHK23a were shared by isolates from human and animal sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据