4.3 Article

Desulfurization of mucin by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: influence of sulfate in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 61, 期 12, 页码 1644-1653

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.047167-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common cause of chronic respiratory infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Infection is established within the lung epithelial mucus layer through adhesion to mucins. Terminal residues on mucin oligosaccharide chains are highly sulfated and sialylated, which increases their resistance to degradation by bacterial enzymes. However, a number of microbes, including P. aeruginosa, display mucin sulfatase activity. Using ion chromatography, the levels of sulfation on different respiratory mucins and the availability of inorganic sulfate to pathogens in sputum from CF patients were quantified. The ability of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa to desulfate mucin was tested by providing nnucin as a sole sulfur source for growth. All tested P. aeruginosa strains isolated from the lungs of CF patients were able to use human respiratory mucin as a source of sulfur for growth, whereas other non-clinical species of the genus Pseudomonas were not. However, measured levels of inorganic sulfate in sputum from CF patients suggested that bacteria resident in the lung have sufficient inorganic sulfate for growth and are unlikely to require access to mucin sulfur as a sulfur source during chronic infection. This was confirmed when expression of sulfate-repressed P. aeruginosa genes atsK and msuE was found to be repressed in the sputum of CF patients, which was detected by using quantitative RT-PCR. These results indicate that sulfate starvation is unlikely to occur in pathogens residing in the sputum of CF patients and, therefore, mucin desulfation may have an alternative purpose in the association between P. aeruginosa and the airways of CF patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据