4.3 Article

Nationwide epidemiological study revealed the dissemination of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying a specific set of virulence-associated genes in Japanese hospitals

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 58, 期 10, 页码 1329-1336

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.010173-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Japan [12557027, 14370090]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [14370090, 12557027] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study comprehensive toxin profiles and the chromosomal diversity of current Japanese hospital-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) strains, we conducted PCR-based identification of 28 toxin genes, and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing and PFGE analysis of 208 MRSA strains isolated from 100 hospitals throughout Japan. Of the tested HA-MRSA strains, 80.3 % were tst-positive. The most frequent toxin gene profile was characterized by the carriage of 13 genes, tst, sec, seg, sei, sel, sem, sen, seo, lukED, hla, hlb, Not and hlg-2. Ninety of the 208 strains had this profile, which was named pattern A. Among the 118 non-pattern A strains, 100 had similar toxin gene profiles, the concordance rates to pattern A of which were more than 80 %. Consequently, 91.3 % of the examined HA-MRSA strains carried similar toxin profiles, although PFGE patterns showed a wide variation. These strains belonged to SCCmec type II, agr II and coagulase type II. We concluded that, unlike MRSA from many other countries, most of the Japanese HA-MRSA strains belonged to, or were related to, a specific group carrying the set of 13 toxin genes, irrespective of chromosomal diversity. In addition, among the 13 toxin genes, the coexistence rates of tst, sec and sel, and those of seg, sei, sem, sen and seo, were higher than for the other toxin genes. High coexistence rates of tst, sec and sel genes suggested the presence of the pathogenicity island SaPIn1 in these strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据