4.5 Article

BRCA1 R1699Q variant displaying ambiguous functional abrogation confers intermediate breast and ovarian cancer risk

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 49, 期 8, 页码 525-532

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101037

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  2. NHMRC [145684, 288704]
  3. National Breast Cancer Foundation
  4. Queensland Cancer Fund
  5. Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia
  6. Cancer Foundation of Western Australia
  7. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Team Grant in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer [CRN-87521]
  8. Swedish Cancer Society
  9. German Cancer Aid [107364]
  10. Centre for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  11. Association d'Aide a la Recherche Cancerologique de Saint Cloud (ARCs)
  12. Ligue 92 contre le Cancer
  13. NIH [CA116167, CA116167Z]
  14. Komen Race for the Cure Fellowship
  15. NEYE Foundation
  16. Komen Foundation for the Cure
  17. OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center
  18. Cancer Association of South Africa
  19. Dutch Cancer Society [2001-2471, 2006-3677]
  20. National Institutes of Health Recovery Act supplement award [CA116167Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Clinical classification of rare sequence changes identified in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is essential for appropriate genetic counselling of individuals carrying these variants. We previously showed that variant BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln in the BRCA1 transcriptional transactivation domain demonstrated equivocal results from a series of functional assays, and proposed that this variant may confer low to moderate risk of cancer. Methods Measures of genetic risk (report of family history, segregation) were assessed for 68 BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) families recruited through family cancer clinics, comparing results with 34 families carrying the previously classified pathogenic BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp (R1699W) mutation at the same residue, and to 243 breast cancer families with no BRCA1 pathogenic mutation (BRCA-X). Results Comparison of BRCA1 carrier prediction scores of probands using the BOADICEA risk prediction tool revealed that BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln variant carriers had family histories that were less 'BRCA1-like' than BRCA1 c.5095C>T p.Arg1699Trp mutation carriers (p<0.00001), but more 'BRCA1-like' than BRCA-X families (p=0.0004). Further, modified segregation analysis of the subset of 30 families with additional genotyping showed that BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln had reduced penetrance compared with the average truncating BRCA1 mutation penetrance (p=0.0002), with estimated cumulative risks to age 70 of breast or ovarian cancer of 24%. Conclusions Our results provide substantial evidence that the BRCA1 c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) variant, demonstrating ambiguous functional deficiency across multiple assays, is associated with intermediate risk of breast and ovarian cancer, highlighting challenges for risk modelling and clinical management of patients of this and other potential moderate-risk variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据