4.5 Article

Revisiting genome wide association studies (GWAS) in coeliac disease: replication study in Spanish population and expression analysis of candidate genes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 48, 期 7, 页码 493-496

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2011.089714

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [07/0796, CES08/016, CA08/300]
  2. Basque Department of Health [2006/111030]
  3. Basque Department of Industry [SAIO-2008/00231]
  4. Basque Department of Education [BIF-2009-099, BIF-2010-189]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Health [CES05/036]
  6. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI070244]
  7. Fundacion IECSCYL
  8. Phadia Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Recent genome wide association studies (GWAS) on coeliac disease (CD) have identified risk loci harbouring genes that fit the accepted pathogenic model and are considered aetiological candidates. Methods Using Taqman single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and expression assays, the study genotyped 11 SNPs tagging eight GWAS regions (1q31, 2q11-2q12, 3p21, 3q25-3q26, 3q28, 4q27, 6q25 and 12q24) in a Spanish cohort of 1094 CD patients and 540 controls, and performed expression analyses of candidate genes (RGS1, IL18R1/IL18RAP, CCR3, IL12A/SCHIP1, LPP, IL2/IL21-KIAA1109, TAGAP, and SH2B3) in intestinal mucosa from 29 CD children and eight controls. Results Polymorphisms in 1q31, 2q11-2q12, and 3q25 showed association in our cohort, and also 3q28 and 4q27 when combined with a previous study. Expression levels of IL12A, IL18RAP, IL21, KIAA1109, LPP, SCHIP1, and SH2B3 were affected by disease status, but the correlation between genotype and mRNA levels was observed only in IL12A, LPP, SCHIP1, and SH2B3. Conclusions Expression differences between treated CD patients and controls along with SNP expression associations suggest a possible primary role for these four genes and their variants in pathogenesis. The lack of SNP effect in the remaining genes is probably a consequence of arbitrary candidate gene selection within association signals that are not based on functional studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据