4.5 Article

A novel NGF mutation clarifies the molecular mechanism and extends the phenotypic spectrum of the HSAN5 neuropathy

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 131-135

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2010.081455

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Action Medical Research, UK
  3. Pfizer, Sandwich, UK
  4. Medical Research Council [G1001253, G0601943, G0802760, G108/638] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [G0601943, G1001253, G108/638, G0802760] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Nerve growth factor beta (NGF beta) and tyrosine kinase receptor type A (TRKA) are a well studied neurotrophin/receptor duo involved in neuronal survival and differentiation. The only previously reported hereditary sensory neuropathy caused by an NGF mutation, c.661C>T (HSAN5), and the pathology caused by biallelic mutations in the TRKA gene (NTRK1) (HSAN4), share only some clinical features. A consanguineous Arab family, where five of the six children were completely unable to perceive pain, were mentally retarded, did not sweat, could not discriminate temperature, and had a chronic immunodeficiency, is reported here. The condition is linked to a new homozygous mutation in the NGF gene, c. [680C>A]+[681_682delGG]. Methods Genetic linkage and standard sequencing techniques were used to identify the causative gene. Using wild-type or mutant over-expression constructs transfected into PC12 and COS-7 cells, the cellular and molecular consequences of the mutations were investigated. Results The mutant gene produced a precursor protein V232fs that was unable to differentiate PC12 cells. V232fs was not secreted from cells as mature NGF beta. Conclusions Both the clinical and cellular data suggest that the c.[680C>A]+[ 681 682delGG] NGF mutation is a functional null. The HSAN5 phenotype is extended to encompass HSAN4-like characteristics. It is concluded that the HSAN4 and HSAN5 phenotypes are parts of a phenotypic spectrum caused by changes in the NGF/ TRKA signalling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据