4.5 Article

17q21.31 microduplication patients are characterised by behavioural problems and poor social interaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 524-530

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2008.065367

关键词

-

资金

  1. Catholic University of Leuven [GOA/2006/12]
  2. Centre of Excellence SymBioSys, Research Council K. U. Leuven [EF/05/007]
  3. IWT [IWT 60848]
  4. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Microdeletions at 17q21.31 have recently been shown to cause a novel syndrome. Here we identify the reciprocal 17q21.31 duplication syndrome in 4 patients. Method: Patients with the 17q21.31 duplication were identified by screening a large cohort of patients (n=13 070) with mental retardation and congenital malformation by comparative genomic hybridisation microarray. Parental origin was investigated in 3 patients by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and microsatellite genotyping. Results: In three cases it was possible to show that duplication arose de novo. Intellectual skills range from normal to mild mental retardation. Patients are characterised by poor social interaction, with relationship difficulties, reminiscent of autistic spectrum disorders. Other features are rather variable with no striking common phenotypic features. Parental origin was investigated for 3 patients. In all cases duplication was of maternal origin either through interchromosomal (2 cases) or interchromatid (1 case) rearrangement. The 3 mothers are all carriers of the inverted H2 haplotype, emphasising the role of local genomic architecture alteration as a predisposing factor for this duplication. Conclusion: Autistic features observed in our patients suggest that genes in the duplicated interval should be considered as candidates for disorders in the autistic spectrum. Other phenotypic observations are rather variable or aspecific. This adds 17q21.31 duplications to a growing group of recently identified genomic disorders with variable penetrance and expressivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据