4.3 Article

SIMULATION OF CRACK PROPAGATION IN THREE-POINT BENDING PIEZOELECTRIC BEAM BASED ON THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC PIEZOELECTRIC DAMAGE MECHANICS

期刊

JOURNAL OF MECHANICS
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 521-531

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jmech.2011.55

关键词

Anisotropic piezoelectric damage constitutive model; Combined damage; Fracture criterion; Quasi-static crack propagation

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-06-0645]
  2. Program for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei Province [2007ABB010]
  3. Ph.D Program Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [200804870025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A finite element method combined with three-dimensional anisotropic piezoelectric continuum damage mechanics is presented to simulate quasi-static crack propagation behavior in piezoelectric ceramics in this paper. In this method, the three-dimensional anisotropic piezoelectric damage constitutive model is utilized for characterizing the effects of mechanical and electrical damages on the fields near the crack tip, the combined-damage from the dominant mechanical and electrical damage components is regarded as the fracture criterion, and the gradient of combined-damage is assumed to control crack growth direction. A set of numerical simulations of the midspan crack propagation in a three-point bending PZT-4 beam are performed in various loading conditions. After the numerical results are validated by comparison with the corresponding experimental ones, the effects of mechanical and electrical loads on the cracking behavior are respectively evaluated. It is found from the obtained results that mechanical and electrical loads influence on the damage fields in the vicinity of the crack-tip, as well as the crack growth rate, in a significant way. With the increment in mechanical loading, the crack growth rate obviously increases. This means that positive and negative electric fields enhance and inhibit crack propagation, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据