4.1 Article

High Overweight and Obesity in Fontan Patients: A 20-Year History

期刊

PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 192-200

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-015-1265-7

关键词

Heart defect; Congenital; Obesity; Pediatrics; Fontan procedure; Growth

资金

  1. Intramural Program of the NIH, The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of obesity in long-term survivors with complex congenital heart disease may be increasing, and little is known about the timing and onset of weight gain and growth patterns in these high-risk patients. Prevalence rates of overweight/obesity and longitudinal changes in body mass index (BMI) with age were determined in 606 patients with Fontan circulation seen at a tertiary care cardiology center from 1992 to 2012. The number of clinic encounters (n) was stratified by age group (n = 401, 2-5 years; n = 333, 6-11 years; n = 217, 12-19 years; and n = 129, > 20 years). Among adults, 39 % were overweight/obese at last clinic visit; 22 % overweight, and 17 % obese. Childhood anthropometric data were available for 82 adults, of which 15 % (n = 12/82) were overweight/obese in childhood. The likelihood of being overweight/obese as an adult was three times higher if there was a BMI a parts per thousand yen 85th percentile in childhood (CI 2.1-4.5, P < 0.01). Overweight/obesity in adulthood was associated with lower heart failure rates (4 vs. 19 %, P = 0.03). Pediatric rates of overweight/obesity were comparable to national data (NHANES 2011-2012) in every age group: at 2-5 years, (25 vs. 23 %), 6-11 years (26 vs. 34 %), and 12-19 years (15 vs. 35 %). Systolic blood pressure was higher in overweight/obese children as young as 2-5 years of age. Childhood and adult survivors with Fontan circulation have high rates of overweight/obesity. Childhood obesity is a strong predictor of future adiposity and is linked to changes in systolic blood pressure at a very young age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据