4.2 Article

On interference of orbital communications in molecular systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 806-815

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10910-010-9777-0

关键词

Amplitude channel; Chemical bonds; Bonding mechanisms; Direct/indirect communications; Information theory; Interference of orbital communications; Multiple probability-scattering; Through-space/bridge bond components

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The atomic orbitals (AO) contributed by bonded atoms of molecular systems emit or receive the signals of electronic allocations to these basis functions, thus acting as the signal source (input) or receiver (output), respectively, in the associated communication network. Each orbital simultaneously participates in both the through-space and through-bridge probability propagations: the former involve direct communications between two AO while the latter are realized indirectly via orbital intermediates. This work examines the interference effects of the amplitudes of molecular probability scatterings, and introduces the operator representation of AO communications. The eigenvalue problem of the associated Hermitian operator combining the forward and reverse information propagations defines the stationary modes (standing waves) of the molecular propagation of electronic conditional probabilities. The combined effect of interference between the multiple (direct and indirect) information scatterings, which establishes the stationary distribution of electronic probabilities, is probed. The wave-superposition principle for the conditional-probability amplitudes of the generalized through-bridge information propagation is linked to the idempotency relations of the system density matrix. It explicitly demonstrates that the resultant effect of the probability propagations involving bridges containing all basis functions, at arbitrary bridge orders indeed generates the (stationary) molecular distribution of conditional probabilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据