4.4 Article

Demographic stochasticity and evolution of dispersion I. Spatially homogeneous environments

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY
卷 70, 期 3, 页码 647-678

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-014-0776-9

关键词

Patch dynamics; Demographic fluctuations; Stochastic dynamics; Weak selection; Small noise approximation; Mean-field dynamics

资金

  1. NSF [DMS-0927587, PHY-1205219]
  2. NSF's Institute for Mathematics and its Applications
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Physics [1205219] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The selection of dispersion is a classical problem in ecology and evolutionary biology. Deterministic dynamical models of two competing species differing only in their passive dispersal rates suggest that the lower mobility species has a competitive advantage in inhomogeneous environments, and that dispersion is a neutral characteristic in homogeneous environments. Here we consider models including local population fluctuations due to both individual movements and random birth and death events to investigate the effect of demographic stochasticity on the competition between species with different dispersal rates. In this paper, the first of two, we focus on homogeneous environments where deterministic models predict degenerate dynamics in the sense that there are many (marginally) stable equilibria with the species' coexistence ratio depending only on initial data. When demographic stochasticity is included the situation changes. A novel large carrying capacity () asymptotic analysis, confirmed by direct numerical simulations, shows that a preference for faster dispersers emerges on a precisely defined time scale. We conclude that while there is no evolutionarily stable rate for competitors to choose in these models, the selection mechanism quantified here is the essential counterbalance in spatially inhomogeneous models including demographic fluctuations which do display an evolutionarily stable dispersal rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据