4.4 Article

From Markovian to pairwise epidemic models and the performance of moment closure approximations

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 1021-1042

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-011-0443-3

关键词

Network; Epidemic; Markov chain; Moment closure

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/H001085/1, EP/H016139/1]
  2. OTKA [81403]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H001085/1, EP/J002437/1, EP/H016139/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/H016139/1, EP/J002437/1, EP/H001085/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many if not all models of disease transmission on networks can be linked to the exact state-based Markovian formulation. However the large number of equations for any system of realistic size limits their applicability to small populations. As a result, most modelling work relies on simulation and pairwise models. In this paper, for a simple SI S dynamics on an arbitrary network, we formalise the link between a well known pairwise model and the exact Markovian formulation. This involves the rigorous derivation of the exact ODE model at the level of pairs in terms of the expected number of pairs and triples. The exact system is then closed using two different closures, one well established and one that has been recently proposed. A new interpretation of both closures is presented, which explains several of their previously observed properties. The closed dynamical systems are solved numerically and the results are compared to output from individual-based stochastic simulations. This is done for a range of networks with the same average degree and clustering coefficient but generated using different algorithms. It is shown that the ability of the pairwise system to accurately model an epidemic is fundamentally dependent on the underlying large-scale network structure. We show that the existing pairwise models are a good fit for certain types of network but have to be used with caution as higher-order network structures may compromise their effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据